Follow FOLA on Facebook - just click the "f" link in the header above.
We are humbled and grateful for this victory that you
Thank you for all your hard work and dedication to achieve this milestone in Florida’s history.
For future generations and for Florida!
The Campaign Team -- Will, Pegeen, Aliki, and Laura
Vote Yes on Amendment 1, The Water & Land Conservation Amendment
FOLA also wishes a sincere thanks to all who understood the value and voted YES on Amendment 1.
This November Election is Important
Amendment 1 gives Florida voters a direct opportunity to keep drinking
water clean, protect our rivers, lakes, and springs, restore natural
treasures like the Everglades, and protect our beaches and shores.
Amendment 1 is our best opportunity to address threats to our water quality and keep pollution out of our waters—without any increase in taxes.
Floridians understand the value of clean and abundant water for people and wildlife, and they cherish the natural areas that make Florida special. That’s why Amendment 1 would ensure that these values have a place in our state’s constitution.
To learn why FOLA believes you should care about this important choice, visit VoteYesOn1. FOLA's endorsement is in process.
North Shore Land Sale
Two parcels of land in the Northeast corner of the North Shore area that
were not included in the original plan have recently been offered for sale
by St Johns River Water management District. See
FOLA has told the SJRWMD that we are interested in whether these parcels can be included in our ecotourism planning.
FOLA has received this draft copy of the
Harris Chain Council’s Goals and Objectives framework, to be discussed at an
upcoming TAG meeting.
Following this, please see a draft copy of FOLA's responses.
translates into better aquatic habitat, fisheries, and public-use and
economic opportunities for the Harris Chain of Lakes
An overarching (action) goal for the Harris Chain of Lakes
Objective 1 – Control nutrient and sediment inputs
a. Continued long-term support for the Lake County Water Authority (LCWA) Nutrient Removal Facility (NuRF) for treating non-flood discharges from Lake Apopka to the lakes downstream.
b. Minimize direct releases from Harris Bayou into Lake Griffin with the construction of by-pass infrastructure.
c. Continued long-term support for agricultural, urban, and other categories of structural and non-structural best management practices (BMPs) as part of the total maximum daily load (TMDL) program, which the key implementation strategy under the Upper Ocklawaha Basin Management Action Plan (BMAP).
Objective 2 – Continue to improve aquatic habitat and water quality
a. Directly connect marshlands within the North Shore Restoration Area (NSRA) to Lake Apopka in those areas where the St. Johns Water Management District is not subject to land/water use restrictions as part of the agreement with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
b. Support a pilot program to allow hydrilla to grow naturally in selected areas of Lake Apopka in an attempt to stabilize lake bottom sediments, improve water clarity, and provide important fisheries habitat. Hydrilla would be controlled to prevent encroachment into areas of the lake with public access and navigation opportunities, private docks, and habitat supporting the crappie fishery.
Objective 3 – Capitalize on habitat and water-quality improvements
a. Gain the support of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) for designating the Harris Chain of Lakes as Trophy Bass Resource by implementing a catch-and-release only regulation for largemouth bass of 16 inches or greater in length.
b. Improve public access to Lake Apopka, particularly in the deeper sections of the lake along the western shore.
DRAFT COMMENTS ON HARRIS CHAIN OF LAKES RESTORATION COUNCIL OBJECTIVES
The following comments are submitted by FOLA in response to the draft
goals and objective framework of the HCLRL in notifying the SJRWMD of their
agenda for an upcoming TAG meeting.
Objective 1 - Control nutrient and sediment inputs
FOLA recognizes the value of alum treatment for nutrient removal if done properly. FOLA objected to the NURF project because of its location (the only portion of the Apopka restoration that had never been tilled, allowing for restoration to a wet prairie habitat) and because it would have been more effective downstream. FOLA also warned of the fact that low water levels in the lake would inhibit the operation of the system that was very expensive to construct and operate.
Objective 2 - Continue to improve aquatic habitat and water quality.
(a) FOLA objects to any proposal to directly connect the marshlands on the north shore to the lake. Soil oxidation occurred while the soil was dried for years and would make the area that was marshland become more lake bottom if flooded. With our goal for restoration centered on the lake for fishing operations and the marsh for bird habitat, we feel restoration of surrounding upland habitat, marshland and lake bottom will provide a variety of habitats that will better support ecotourism.
(b) FOLA continues to object to any proposal that allows establishment of hydrilla in any portion of the lake. It does not take a scientist to know that once this very aggressive plant gets established in a shallow high nutrient body of water it will be difficult if not impossible to eradicate or control. This issue has been evaluated many times and this conclusion has been agreed upon by many scientists (See Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Position Paper 04/27/2011, Section I.)
Objective 3 - Capitalize on habitat and water quality improvements
(a) FOLA agrees with the goals to promote an active fishery in the lake but there are other ecotourism values that are equally valuable.
(b) FOLA has continued to promote a new boat ramp in the deeper part of the lake, in Oakland. FOLA has found an ideal site with a willing landowner and has completed a preliminary engineering plan with cost estimates.
Citizen advocacy and advisory groups can be very beneficial to local projects and problems but can also be responsible for slowing or eliminating beneficial proposals and for wasting time and money as competition for resources builds. A Restoration Council should be concerned with the whole ecosystem and should base all decisions on the best science available. Lake Apopka is an important part of the Harris Chain ecosystem, in fact, the headwaters. Until this lake is restored it will be difficult to see major changes downstream.
Instead of fostering constant competition, for water, weed control and other restoration necessities, we should be working on constant cooperation to see that the needs of the whole system are met.
Friends of Lake Apopka
FRIENDS OF LAKE APOPKA NEED MORE ADVOCATES
The Friends of Lake Apopka incorporated in 1991 and has been a strong advocacy group for the restoration of Lake
Apopka since that time. The group formed after years of seeing a green lake and no fishermen and the final trigger
that spurred them into action was a decision to allow the farms on the north shore ten more years of farming and a
legislative bill to fund dumping of concrete rubble around the shoreline of the lake.
The call to organize got a good response and the group was instrumental in getting legislative attention which eventually resulted in a buyout of the farms (and the concrete bill got squashed in committee before it even got to the floor)! Since that time the group has been proactive in reviewing proposals for the massive restoration project and overcoming opposition that would hinder plans. Support for the group has been phenomenal!
One of the reasons for success of the group was the decision at the very beginning that any action would be based on the science of the problem or proposal. This decision separated the group from those who were more interested in protesting or following unsubstantiated proposals and plans. Letters and responses to elected officials were based on facts.
As the restoration proceeds, FOLA has followed the data as closely as possible and tries to keep the public informed. Public meetings were either aimed at updating progress (or in some cases, opposing proposals, such as fighting the hydrilla proposal). A spin-off project, the Oakland Nature Preserve, was planned to keep the public involved and to provide environmental education programs for students as well as interested adults.
Now we have a problem. More than ever, we are seeing issues being resolved more by poilitics than by science . This brings about the need for many advocates who are willing to learn about the details of a proposal and then to respond to the elected officials responsible for plans and funding. If a politician gets a few letters or phone calls he may or may not pay attention. If he gets 200 well informed responses he will be more likely to respond positively!
This is a call for help! Anyone interested in joining FOLA, getting emails and newsletters or serving on the Board of Directors please respond to our website address firstname.lastname@example.org. The individual dues for this organization is only $10.00/year—the organization needs advocates more than money! The next meeting is Thursday, November 7 at 5:30 P.M. at the Oakland Nature Preserve and the public is invited to attend. A current update will be presented. The next year in the restoration process is critical to this wonderful lake!
Lake Apopka Basin Master Plan
In 2001, FOLA commissioned Land Design Innovations to prepare a conceptual master plan for Lake Apopka Basin. See this conceptual master plan for greenways, trails, recreation and ecotourism opportunities in the Lake Apopka Basin at Master Plan. Note: This is a large file and may take a minute to load.
Lake Apopka Timeline
We have updated our Lake Apopka Timeline to include events that have occured through August 2011. See this latest version at Timeline. If you do not have a PDF file reader you may get the free Adobe reader by clicking the link below.
purpose as a well-informed citizen group is to stay focused on the fundamental goal of restoring Lake Apopka to the
valuable resource it once was. If you share this goal, we welcome and need you to get involved and become an active
You can start by clicking Membership for more information.
Water, Water Everywhere ?
The concerns surrounding water conservation are important to every resident of West Orange County. For some good
information on this critical topic, see:
Water, Water, Everywhere?...
Plant Management in Florida Waters...
Mirage, Florida and the Vanishing Water of the Eastern U.S.
Oakland Nature Preserve
By the mid-1990’s, the restoration of the long polluted and endlessly abused Lake Apopka was under way. The Board of
Directors of the Friends of Lake Apopka, the main citizen advocacy group for the lake, realized that long-term citizen
support for the restoration process was necessary and also noted that, as the lake was restored, development pressures
in the basin would increase. This led to a search to find land now on the shoreline where the restoration could be
interpreted for the public, providing a window on this process with a boardwalk to the lake. The result became the
beautiful Oakland Nature Preserve.
For an excellent article with a concise history of birding on the reclaimed North Shore of Lake Apopka, see Florida's Special Places: Lake Apopka on Audubon of Florida News. The author has been birding there since 1998 and includes some very nice pictures.
Keep up with what's happening at the St Johns River Water Management District with the latest Water News.
Lake County Parks & Trails
Read about upcoming nature hikes and bird surveys in the current issue of the
Lake County Parks & Trails
Green Mountain Scenic Byway
Yes, Florida does have hills! Beginning at the Howey Crossroads (the intersection of Lake County Roads 455 and 561), the Green Mountain Scenic Byway winds southeast along Lake County Roads 455 and Old Highway 50 for 12 ½ miles through some of the highest hills of the Lake Wales Ridge. See the Green Mountain Scenic Byway Master Plan at this new Green Mountain Scenic Byway Project Website.